Napa Cabernet Sauvignon Wine Vs Grape Pricing

cabAs we wrap up the 2016 harvest, wineries and growers begin to settle up for grape deliveries. What determines grape pricing and how does this pricing affect wine pricing?

Because Napa grape costs are the highest in California, virtually all red wine made with Napa grapes must be retail priced at $40 or more per bottle for the winery to receive a reasonable profit. The majority of Napa’s production is from two Bordeaux varieties, Cabernet Sauvignon (43%) and Merlot (11%).  When the other three Bordeaux varieties, Cab Franc, Malbec and Petit Verdot are added, production totals 59% of Napa’s grape crop.

Napa’s lower priced grapes are dominated by white varieties, Chardonnay and Sauvignon Blanc, representing approximately 25% of Napa production.

Since Cabernet Sauvignon is the dominant variety in Napa, let’s focus on the economics of its production and pricing. For a winery to experience a reasonable profit, grape costs should not exceed 25% of the wine’s selling price. As a consequence, the tonnage grape to retail bottle price ratio should range from 100 for lower priced Napa Cabernet Sauvignon to as high as 140 times for more expensive Cabernet.

The attached winery profiles show the economics at various wine pricing levels. In each of these profiles, the winery realizes a profit equal to 15% of sales. Most Napa Valley wineries sell a mix of retail and wholesale through distributors. Traditionally, sales to distributors are at 50% of the retail price. As the wine price goes up, generally a higher portion of wine is sold retail, so while wine production costs increase in absolute terms, they will decrease as a percentage of sales. Offsetting this increased gross profit are higher selling and administrative costs per case due to the combination of lower sales volume, a higher percentage of retail sales and a lack of scale.

cab-chart-2


Bottom line, if Napa Valley wine is retail priced outside of this 100 to 140 times grape cost to bottle price range, the economics don’t work for the winery.

Sparkling wine – it’s not just from France anymore

sparkling glassesBubbly, Champers, Sparklers, Fizz – when consumers are looking for sparkling wine, they are no longer simply being offered French Champagne. Other country’s products, like Italian Prosecco, Spanish Cava and US Méthode Champenoise are flooding the market.

In April, I gave a presentation at the 2016 Sparkling Wine Symposium in Oregon and here are a few of the interesting details from that presentation.

According to the Organisation of Vine & Wine (OVW), France accounted for 22% of the sparkling wine production for 2013 with Italy and Germany close behind at 20% and 16% respectively.

The category, has seen an increase of 40% since 2003 to 200M cases annually in 2013 representing 7% of global wine production.chart captureNot only is more sparkling wine being made – more wine is being drunk.

In the US, sparkling wine consumption has doubled from 2003 to 2013. A report from the Wine Institute states that in 2014, 80 California producers shipped 9.4 million cases to US markets alone. In 2013, for drinkers in foreign markets, Germany lead with 34M cases and France and Russia followed with 23M cases each. Overall, from 2003 to 2013, sparkling wine consumption has increased by 30%.

rose sparkling1For producers & winemakers, there are some barriers to entrance in this market – most notably production costs (especially for Méthode Champenoise) & global competition but sparkling wine lovers now have more options by price point, style of wine and country of origin than ever before. Cheers to that.